Still A Mystery After 27 Years
Twenty-seven years after Eloise Worledge was snatched from her bed in the dead of night,
her mother yesterday said that the family had long ago accepted the eight-year-old's
disappearance as a mystery.
Speaking after coroner Frank Hender ruled it was impossible to identify
who was responsible for Eloise's disappearance, Patsy Worledge said the
family had "come to our own form of closure years ago".
Eloise Anne Worledge was taken from her home in Scott Street,
Beaumaris, in the early hours of January 12, 1976. A flywire
screen on her wind-out window was partially cut and rolled
upwards and the window was fully open.
Her abduction sparked the biggest Victorian missing person's search in history.
Despite a recent 12-month re-investigation of new leads, a homicide squad detective
confirmed the case still baffled police.
Detective Senior Constable Robert Nazaretian told the Melbourne
Coroners Court that despite Eloise's father, Lindsay, being the prime
suspect at the time of her disappearance, a 2001 investigation found no
evidence to implicate either of Eloise's parents as the culprit. And new
investigations of known sex offenders, including a teacher and a librarian
at Beaumaris Primary School, failed to uncover any new evidence, he said.
Outside court, Ms Worledge said the family had been "devoted to learning from our experiences,
to healing and accepting the mystery"."And it is indeed a mystery. And we don't
actually need to know," she said.
Lindsay Worledge was not present at the hearing.
Senior Constable Nazaretian said evidence suggested someone had
staged the scene to look as if the flywire screen was cut from the
inside to avert suspicion from people connected to the Worledges.
The motivation to cut the screen from the inside by an intruder with
no connection to the household seemed inconceivable, he said. But entry,
exit or both was most probably made through the front door, which Ms
Worledge said she had left wide open, Senior Constable Nazaretian said.
The court heard that both Lindsay and Patsy Worledge had been having
affairs at the time and Mr Worledge was depressed about their looming separation.
He was to move out of the house the day Eloise went missing, a fact Senior Constable
Nazaretian described as "striking in its timing".
He said that in 2002 Ms Worledge told police that at the time of Eloise's
disappearance she believed Lindsay Worledge "was involved in the disappearance as a
means of prolonging the inevitable and as a way of spiting her". Mr Worledge denied
involvement in the abduction and a lie detector test proved inconclusive, the court heard.
Convicted sex offenders interviewed when the case was reopened included a teacher and a
school librarian at Beaumaris Primary, as well as a man who coached at the Beaumaris
junior soccer club. But police could not uncover any evidence of their involvement in
Eloise's disappearance, or any evidence linking sex killer Raymond "Mr Stinky" Edmunds
to the crime.
Suspects at the time included Ms Worledge's two female friends and her sister,
Margaret Thomas, but a reinvestigation of their police interviews found the links
baseless.
Giving an open finding, Mr Hender said Eloise was a shy girl who would not have
voluntarily left home with a stranger. He said significant information given to police
included a neighbour's account of hearing a child cry out and a car door slam at 2am
on the night of the disappearance.
"It is not possible on the evidence to find who were the person or persons
responsible or when and how Eloise met her demise but her disappearance
and presumed death remains suspicious," Mr Hender said.
The Age (8-7-2003)
Selma Milovanovic
|
|