Predators Of A Different Kind
GAVIN Maxwell Hopper
and Karen Louise Ellis
are both sexual predators
who had carnal relationships with young people
in their care.
They both taught,
physical education and
seriously breached the
bond of trust that should
exist between a teacher
and a pupil.
Hopper, 48, seduced a
14-year-old girl for several
years in the 1980s, and Ellis
last year had a brief affair
with a 15-year-old boy. But
while Hopper was jailed in
August for 3 1/2yrs with a
minimum term of two
years and three months
Ellis, 37, yesterday walked
free from the court.
Sentencing Ellis to a
22-month suspended jail
term, Judge John Smallwood said no comparison
could be made with the
Hopper case.
No two cases are the
same in the eyes of the
law but the differences
between Hopper and Ellis
were marked and had little to do with the gender
of their victims.
Ellis was not treated
more leniently than Hopper because she had sex
with a boy who seemed
happy about it.
According to the evidence in his trial, Judge
Graeme Crossley's sentencing remarks and
other evidence that has
come to light, Hopper was
a cunning sexual hunter
who sought out young
girls to seduce. He was
notorious at Wesley College for his attraction to
young girls and his predatory behaviour.
Judge Crossley noted
Hopper had no remorse.
He played his victim along,
enmeshed her in a suffocating relationship from
which she felt she could
not escape and shattered
her emotionally.
Ellis' relationship with
the boy was in some
senses naive. They went
to movies like an ordinary
couple and held hands.
Ellis and the boy had sex,
at her North Eltham home
in a six-week period She
behaved like a teenager
and bombarded him with
SMS messages like he was
her boyfriend.
The law also gives generous sentencing discounts for people prepared to admit their guilt.
Hopper denied all
knowledge of the sexual
relationship with his victim, tried to paint her as
deranged and made her
go through a harrowing
County Court trial.
Judge Crossley said
Hopper's offending
brought about a significant change in his victim's personality and led
to years of psychological
problems for her. He criticised the young girl's figure and she developed an
eating disorder striving to
please her demanding
and domineering lover.
Unlike Hopper, Ellis admitted her offending at
the earliest opportunity
und pleaded guilty to all
the charges against, her.
The mother of three admitted the affair was her
fault and not the boy's. A
sexual relationship between a teacher and a
pupil was wrong, she said.
Ellis knows her suspended sentence means if
she offends again she will
go straight to jail and,
unlike Hopper, she had
some remorse. Although it
was not the most important consideration in her
sentence, the fact her victim did not believe he was
a victim was important.
The boy said he was
not scarred by the affair
and he regarded Ellis as
the victim.
Hopper is a sleazy man
who used his victim like a
puppet, destroyed her
youth, robbed her of her
confidence and lied and
connived to cover it up.
Ellis is a foolish woman
who romantically attached herself to a boy
less than half her age.
She abused his trust
but not in a deeply nasty
way like Hopper. She also
knew she was wrong and
admitted her guilt. That's
why Hopper went to jail
and Ellis walked free.
Herald Sun (11-11-2004)
Norrie Ross
|
|