Abuser Still Caring For Three Children
A WOMAN who sexually abused her son is still caring
for another three of her children.
Investigations are under way into how the Department
of Child Safety could have found the abuse was substantiated
but allowed the women to retain custody of the children.
Queensland Child Safety Minister Mike Reynolds has
ordered a review of the case.
Documents obtained by The Courier-Mail show the
department had "concerns pertaining to the future
risk of sexual harm of the children", including
the abused son, as early as August 2004.
But instead of removing the children, the department
decided to "attempt to manage the risk".
The children were left in the home with supervision
and monitoring by the department.
Six months later, child safety officers found the
mother had sexually harmed the 11-year-old boy.
In an application for a child protection order,
stamped February 17, 2005, a child safety officer
reported that the boy was "a child at risk of
ongoing sexual and emotional harm while he resides
with (name of mother)".
The application said the boy had told departmental
staff that "his mother still plays with his 'earthworm'
secretly. (The boy) clarified that his 'earthworm' was
his penis and he demonstrated to departmental officers
how his mother 'tickles' it".
The department repeated their concerns to the Family
Court in Townsville in a document dated December 1 last
year, stating: "The recorded outcome of substantiated
sexual harm on (the boy) by his mother remains accurate
and correct".
Despite the finding, the mother still lives with three
children under the age of 10, including a seven-year-old boy.
The children's biological father said they had been
removed many times because of allegations of sexual
abuse, and he could not understand why they were still
in her care.
"The children are still in danger," the father said.
"I believe that if she has messed with one, nobody can
tell me the other children are completely left alone.
It means they are in jeopardy."
He now cares for the 11-year-old boy.
Mr Reynolds said he was very concerned about the
allegations and had asked for an external reviewer
to examine the case in detail. He confirmed the
department had been involved with the family for
several years, but that many of the official decisions
in relation to the family pre-dated the Crime and
Misconduct Commission's inquiry into the former
families department.
Mr Reynolds said he was determined to uncover and
"where possible" rectify problems of the past.
"The department recognised that there were concerns
some time ago, and was in the process of reviewing
this case internally by applying current decision-making
and case assessment tools to ensure all relevant child
protection issues were being properly considered," Mr
Reynolds said.
"It is important that when matters like this are
uncovered that we engage independent experts to
look into the concerns so that the complainants
and the general public have full confidence in the
child protection system."
The children's father said he was "overjoyed" by the
latest news of a review, but could not understand
why it had taken so long.
The Courier-Mail (17-2-2006)
Tanya Chilcott-Moore/ Margaret Wenham
|
|